Thursday, January 1, 2015

Two Big White House 'Green' Cronies Unite: First Wind scored over $700 million of stimulus funds, now being acquired by SunEdison

Photo from The Spectrum: Operators stand atop one of the
165 wind turbines at the Milford Wind project in Utah
Did you catch "big" news in the wind industry this past November? Yep, "SunEdison & TerraForm Power to acquire First Wind For $2.4 Billion!" And, most are predicting that this transaction makes SunEdison "one of the world's largest, if not the largest, renewable energy developers."

TerraForm, on the other hand, a SunEdison Co., is "a global renewable energy company" that is helping "change the way renewable energy is generated, distributed, used and owned."

Meanwhile, founded in 2002, the Boston-based First Wind "is an independent renewable energy company exclusively focused on the development, financing, construction, ownership and operation of utility-scale renewable energy projects in the United States."

Sounds terrific.

Well, until you read the fine print, as reported by James Hall, directly following this wind development: "Sun Edison Buying First Wind Scam."

Before you call your broker, review a recent edition of the BATR RealPolitik Newsletter on the topic - Another Green Energy Fraud. When Bloomberg announces that SunEdison, TerraForm to Acquire First Wind for $2.4 Billion, they are not disclosing the entire story.

“Expected to close in the first quarter, the purchase will consist of a $1.9 billion upfront payment and $510 million dependent on First Wind completing backlog projects.

TerraForm will add 521 megawatts of First Wind projects to its portfolio under the deal, with 1.6 gigawatts of projects expected to be developed by SunEdison and dropped down into TerraForm in 2016 and 2017, the companies said in the statement.”

The sordid history of First Wind strikes a record of questionable financial dealing, concealed debt obligations, flipping LLC ownership and holding company discrepancies...

Needless to say, after completing my month-long research on First Wind, I concluded with a few questions. Is this another green energy boondoggle that in reality needed a bailout? Will First Wind eventually warrant a place inside our "150 Billion Cleantech Crash" report that, last January, exposed the 32 Obama-backed green energy companies that have already gone bust, costing taxpayers over $3 billion?

What is clear is that First Wind will be added to our "Troubled Watch List," of which was presented in three categories, and included the 22 green energy companies/projects that have been problematic for some time, placing that figure at over $6.7 billion. At that time, there were also five bailouts (half by taxpayers and half by foreign-owned entities), of which American taxpayers have already spent $7.5 billion.

Keep in mind that these 59 green energy failures ($17.2B) doesn't factor in the numerous DOE funded projects that are still in the shadows, nor my scorching story on the "law-breaking, American hating" Spanish conglomerate Abengoa, that was subsidized with over $3.6 billion in stimulus loans and grants from U.S. taxpayers.

There's the recent development on the Ivanpah Solar Plant and its shady 2011 $1.6 billion stimulus deal that now expects a bailout.

Also, this total does not calculate the tens of billions that Team Obama has spent on other non-stimulus clean-energy deals, nor the stimulus-created and/or funded programs as well as the "green jobs" promise that also flopped –– all costing taxpayers billions more.

Considering that my "cleantech failure" list was prepared a year ago, I've compiled many more that have gone down. So be on the look out for a 2015 release.

As we await the fate of this wind deal, we can confirm that both First Wind and SunEdison were winners of "green," and, as usual, both have direct ties to the Obama White House.

To give you a hint into the "green" cronies –– those with access and influence –– behind First Wind, there is D.E. Shaw & Co. and Larry Summers; Madison Dearbon Partners and Rahm Emanual; as well as Larry Rasky and Vice President Joe Biden. SunEdison, on the other hand, is tied to Goldman Sachs, Tony Podesta and other high-powered lobbyists.

What is key here is that American taxpayers have been propping up First Wind since 2009, which was their plan all along –– "secure taxpayer money and then go public." This includes a Department of Energy (DOE) stimulus loan worth $117 million as well as over $661 million of free taxpayer cash from the 1603 Grant Program.

As of October 2014, 1603 Grant Program Has Dished Out $23 Billion of Taxpayer Cash

Before I begin documenting First Wind's taxpayer cash, let me reiterate that unknown to most American taxpayers is another "green" government freebie blowing out of the stimulus package. This is the 1603 Grant Program, which is part of President Obama’s trillion-dollar spending spree, whereas $100 billion was earmarked for renewable energy.

According to, “The Section 1603 program was created under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to support the deployment of renewable energy resources. The 1603 program offered project developers the option to select a one-time cash payment in lieu of taking the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) or the Production Tax Credit (PTC), for which they would have otherwise been eligible.”

Currently, "the 1603 American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act (ARRTA) program "offers renewable energy project developers cash payments in lieu of investment tax credits (ITC)." The value of an award is equivalent to 30% of the project’s total eligible cost basis in most cases.

Excuse me while I go off on a tangent, because understanding the difference between these three costly "green" incentives, is not only important, but also infuriating.

Production Tax Credit (PTC) 

Originally enacted as the part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, the Production Tax Credit (PTC), as explained by WRI Digest, "reduces the federal income taxes of qualified tax-paying owners of renewable energy projects based on the electrical output..."

This decades old, controversial, and expensive tax benefit has been recycled and renewed numerous times since –– even as part of the 2009-Recovery Act as well as the 2012 "fiscal cliff" wheeling and dealing.

Recently, Tim Philips, president of Americans for Prosperity, in the Wall Street Journal, gave some alarming figures: "Over the past seven years, the PTC has cost taxpayers $7.3 billion. It is expected to pay out $2.4 billion more in 2015 alone." But I'm not sure if that's the big picture as reflected in a January 2013 report by the Institute for Energy Research called "The Hidden Costs of Wind Power." 

Despite the costs, the "Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014" reinstated the PTC, along with more than 50 other tax credits that expired at the end of 2013.

Why? Because the PTC has been hyped as a jobs creator and measure to "save the planet," as well as the fact that behind the scenes, exists intense and powerful lobbying, especially from those pushing and benefiting from green power.

The Investment Tax Credit (ITC)

Again, as explained by WRI Digest, "The Investment Tax Credit (ITC) reduces federal income taxes for qualified tax-paying owners based on capital investment in renewable energy projects (measured in dollars). The ITC is earned when the equipment is placed into service."

It seems that the "Federal ITC was first signed into law as a part of the Revenue Act of 1962," and has gone through its share of recycling on Capital Hill. But it was the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ("to ensure jobs for our future with secure, affordable, and reliable energy"), which some say "made the Federal ITC more or less what it is today" –– even giving the credit to President George W. Bush, "who increased the tax credit from 10% to 30% of eligible costs for solar and fuel cell projects."

Like the PTC, the ITC has been extended through various legislation –– and under current law, the ITC will remain in effect through December 31, 2016.

Considering that most renewable energy companies/projects (especially wind and solar) rely heavily on these "green" subsidies, and Congress is in cahoots with them, you can bet your bottom dollar (if you have any left since this administration took over), they will be extended many more times.
And, it's doubtful that the 1603 Grant Program (created by the 2009-Stimulus law) is going anywhere soon –– a government giveaway, which as of October 15, 2014, has dished out $23 billion (and counting), funding 98,816 projects.
Worse is that this program (now tied to the PTC and ITC) has become another vehicle to fuel corporate welfare and crony deals –– with Big Green leeching off of these subsidies, while some even feeling entitled. Case in point is the recent absurdity when the mega-firms NRG Energy, BrightSource Energy and Google dared request more taxpayer cash for their $2B pet solar project in California.

Yep, this past November, blaming lack of sunshine, Fox News reported the following: "after already receiving a controversial $1.6 billion construction loan from U.S. taxpayers [in 2011], the wealthy investors of a California solar power plant now want a $539 million federal [1603] grant to pay off their federal loan."

Yet, there is no shame in this type of taxpayer money grab. This is known as "double dipping," where developers (sponsors and investors) of the stimulus-backed projects continue to gorge "themselves on a multi-layered cake of federal, state and local subsidies" –– even to the point where they provide "little skin in the game," leaving taxpayer to foot the risk.

Another alarming aspect of this program is the billions of renewable U.S. money that is being outsourced to other countries, which I had alerted to in January 2013 when the "green tab" was at $16 billion. At that time, the Energy and Commerce Committee had released an “in-depth report on its ongoing investigation into the implementation of President Obama’s green energy stimulus spending.” What they found is this shocking detail: “foreign corporations have received approximately one-quarter of $16 billion spent on 'Section 1603' renewable energy stimulus program.”

Big Wind: Its Dirty Secrets & Eco-massacre

During the course of my masterpiece, "Big Wind Energy Subsidies: A Hurricane of Carnage, Cronyism and Corruption," I addressed the aforementioned stimulus program as well as many other areas important to those of us that care about our environment, our wildlife, and our hard-earned money.

One key area that I updated in my August 2014 post was "Big Wind: Its Dirty Secrets & Eco-massacre." Besides the fact that "wind energy is not clean, not green, and not free," American taxpayers are funding mass murder. As a reminder, in late 2012, Paul Driessen of the Washington Examiner presented some of the gory details: "...The horrific reality is that in the United States alone, 'eco-friendly' wind turbines kill an estimated 13 million to 39 million birds and bats every year."

Where's PETA and the environmentalists screaming bloody murder?


But then again, hypocrisy always follows green energy, because money is the real motive  –– environment be damned. Consider what Peter Roff, a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report, expressed in May 2014:
There are very few people in the environmental movement that seem to care about the number of birds and other species of flying animals who are being decapitated in mid-flight by giant turbines spinning in the breeze. They also don’t seem to care that wind, which is already unreliable because it doesn’t blow all the time, is also more costly to generate than electricity produced though already proven means, such as natural gas and nuclear power. What they care about is the way the Wind Production Tax Credit makes wind energy attractive on the bottom line, not because it is profitable but because of the way the profits and losses line up against the tax credits.
Also, consider the words of Obama's buddy, billionaire Warren Buffet last year:
I will do anything that is basically covered by the law to reduce Berkshire’s tax rate...  For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That’s the only reason to build them. They don’t make sense without the tax credit.
While that is enough to make your head explode, today's Green Corruption File will be following the taxpayer cash and connecting the political cronies.

First Wind Cash: Scored over $778 million in stimulus funds 

Two years ago, I briefly covered First Wind, but there is more to report. We'll begin by pointing out that this renewable energy firm has 21 projects listed across 10 states, two of which are solar, and two are still under construction. That leaves seventeen, of which... wait for it... 82 percent won a significant amount of stimulus funds (over $778 million, and the vast majority from the 1603 Grant Program): eleven are confirmed winners of taxpayer money, with three unconfirmed as well.

Hawaii with 4 projects; 2 cashed in so far

#1) Kahuku Wind is a 30 MW wind farm located on the island of O`ahu in Hawai’i.

In July 2010, the DOE issued a $117 million loan guarantee that helped the Kahuku Wind Power project and its sponsor, First Wind, to finance the construction of a 30 MW wind energy project. This too, was one of those 22 DOE junk loans that I began to expose in April 2012, whereas $16 billion was awarded via the 2009-Stimulus law.

According to the DOE, the project, which was completed in March 2011, "created 200 jobs during construction. It also provides 10 permanent jobs for plant operations."

But that's not all: on February 3, 2012, this same project (Kahuku Wind Power, LLC) snagged a 1603 grant­ for over $35 million [docket #2890 / $35,148,839].

#2) Kawailoa Wind is a 69 MW wind farm located on the island of O`ahu in Hawai’i.  While it seems they proposed this plan along with CH2MHill (another Democrat crony) in September 2010, they began operation in November 2012. On February 28, 2013, this project snagged a 1603 grant for over $58 million [docket #2891/ Kawailoa Wind, LLC / $58,458,629].

Idaho with one; it cashed in

#3) The Power County Wind project in Idaho was developed and came into operation in 2012. On August 12, 2012, Power County Wind Park North LLC, Idaho snagged two large 1603 grants, topping $29 million [docket #2953 / $14,140,490 and #2954 / $15,057,099].

Maine with 6 projects; at least three cashed in so far

#4 & 5) Stetson Wind is an 83 MW wind farm near the Town of Danforth in Washington County, ME, which, according to First Wind, was completed on January 23, 2009 & March 12, 2010. On September 1, 2009, this project won a huge 1603 grant for over $40 million. And then on May 27, 2010, this same project (most likely for phase 2), received another 1603 grant worth over $19 million [docket #3404, Stetson Holdings, LLC, Maine, for $40,441,471 and docket #3405, Stetson Wind II, LLC, Maine for $19,328,865].

#6) The Bull Hill is a 34 MW wind farm located near the Town of Eastbrook in Hancock County, Maine, which, according to First Wind, was completed on October 31, 2012. Via OL's Bull Hill Power Trust c/o Wilmington Trust, National Association, Maine, they, on May 31, 2013, snagged a 1603 grant worth over $21 million [docket #3401 / $21,836,928].

New York with 3; one confirmed has cashed in

#7) Cohocton Wind is a 125 MW wind farm located near the Town of Cohocton in Steuben County, NY that was completed on January 27, 2009. This project is kind of tricky, because the funding was found in a 2010 report by Investigative Reporting Workshop: Map: "Wind farms awarded stimulus grants before program started," which tied Canandaigua Power Partners, LLC to this Cohocton First Wind project.

However, the dates (September 2009) and total funds are slightly different than what is recorded on the federal government's spreadsheet. Needless to say, they won a truck load of cash (two 1603 grants) on September 1, 2009, which can be found at docket #6869 and 6870: Canandaigua Power Partners II, LLC for $22,296,494 and Canandaigua Power Partners, LLC for $52,352,334.

Utah with two; and both confirmed winners 

#8 & 9) Milford Wind [I and II] is a 306 MW wind farm located near the Town of Milford spanning Beaver and Millard Counties in Utah. According to First Wind, these were completed on November 16, 2009 (I) and May 2, 2011 (II). Yep, and both via Milford Wind Corridor Phase I & II, LLC –– one on March 10, 2010, and the other on July 28, 2011 –– scored a humongous 1603 grant ($200 million) [docket #8784 and 8785 / $120,147,810 and $80,436,803].

Vermont has one; and it too, cashed in

#10) Sheffield Wind is a 40 MW wind farm located in the Town of Sheffield in Caledonia County, Vermont, which First Wind states that is was completed on October 16, 2011. Now, on January 23, 2012, Vermont Wind, LLC, Vermont was awarded a 1603 grant worth $35 million [docket #8863 / $35,914,864].

Washington has one; cashed in

#11) The Palouse Wind is a 105 MW wind farm located near the Town of Oakesdale in Whitman County, WA, which as First Wind states, it was completed on December 13, 2012. Just a couple of months later, February 28, 2013 to be exact, Palouse Wind, LLC, Washington won over $57 million of free taxpayer cash [docket # 9002 / $57,309,032].

The others 

According to RNC Research back in July 2012, these three are also First Wind projects that snagged grants from the 1603 Federal Program:
  1. Rollins Wind Farm in Maine: $53,246,347 
  2. Dutch Hill Wind Farm in New York: $22,296,494 
  3. Steel Winds II Wind Farm in New York: $12,778,751 

What does this mean? Well, as stated in my opening: at least 82 percent of First Wind's projects won major subsidies. Since 2009, they scored over $778 million of taxpayer money, of which over $661 million was free cash. 

First Wind Political Cronies

D.E. Shaw & Co & Larry Summers 

Even as the Boston-based First Wind company has direct connections to the former Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick (a "green" Democrat linked to many "green" deals), the first-rate, high-powered political ties to First Wind are vast, starting with D.E. Shaw & Co, a New York-based investment firm –– "a $34 Billion Hedge Fund Giant" ––– that is a backer of First Wind Holdings Inc.

By the way, D.E. Shaw is also a First Solar investor, which won a huge amount of green energy stimulus funds –– $3 billion, last time I checked. Yep, this can be found in the July 2012 Green Corruption File entitled, "The First Solar Three Billion Dollar Swindle."

While D.E. Shaw & Co. are big Democrat donors (candidates and causes), even contributing $49,400 to Barack Obama for the 2012 election cycle, they also, since 1998, have spent a significant amount of money lobbying, specifically toward the Securities & Investment industry.

What's rather interesting is that this firms lobbying efforts dramatically increased in 2009, spending $850,0000, which is reflected in the graph to the LEFT provided by Center for Responsive Politics.

More telling is that the founder, David Shaw, is a two-time Obama bundler, who employed Larry Summers before he headed to the Obama White House as the top economic advisor, where he was designated on November 24, 2008 and served until sometime in 2011. 

As I've noted many times, Summers, Obama's economic czar (not subject to pesky confirmation hearings), is a friend to Wall Street firms like Citigroup and Goldman Sachs (more on them later) that also infiltrated the Obama White House, and won massive amounts of green energy money. Summers is also a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Center for American Progress (CAP), the dark, driving force behind the president’s massive green energy scheme. 

What's worth repeating at this juncture, are the key revelations that came to light from the New Yorker's January 2012 piece in entitled, "The Obama Memos." These "secret letters" included an initial debate on the grim state of our economy at that time, and as they were plotting the so-called economic stimulus package –– which eventually, in February 2009, was enacted into law as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
According to the New Yorker, it was framed inside a 57-page, “Sensitive & Confidential” memo, dated December 15, 2008, written by Larry Summers to President-Elect Obama, whereas Summers warned Obama "that the government was already spending well beyond its means."  
While there were other spending bills on the table (Bailouts for the Big Banks and Big Autos), Summers also cautioned Obama, who had run as a fiscal conservative, that "he was about to preside over an explosion of government spending."  
In the course of reading through this immense memo, we find on page 12 its core: "The short-run economic imperative was to identify as many campaign promises or high priority items that would spend out quickly and be inherently temporary..." 
On page 47, and elsewhere in this memo, we find that green energy was a top priority: "The stimulus package is a key tool for advancing clean energy goals and fulfilling a number of campaign commitments..."

But that's not all: Check out "11 Stunning Revelations From Larry Summers’ Secret Economics Memo To Barack Obama" which was published by the American Enterprise Institute in 2012.

In essence, despite the hype and deception behind the 2009-Recovery Act, it was more about implementing the Obama agenda, then saving our economy from the brink of disaster or creating jobs. Worse, this gigantic legislation that costs taxpayers $840 billion, yet some place the price tag just south of a trillion dollars, has been an epic failure –– even the massive spending to "save the planet."

Let's get back to the Shaw connection: as reported by the Wall Street Journal in 2009, noting his "frequent appearances before Wall Street firms including J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers," Lawrence Summers, who joined D.E. Shaw Group in late 2006 as a managing director, "received about $5.2 million over the past year (2008) in compensation from hedge fund D.E. Shaw.” It turns out that he left the firm in 2008, but may have rejoined at some point after his economic czar gig.

While Summers' bio brags about his work with the both the Obama (Director of the White House National Economic Council) and the Clinton (71st Secretary of the Treasury) administration's, what is missing are some interesting stats that can be found at Bloomberg News, which was documented in August 2013 when Summers was being considered to succeed Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke.
Summers’ current and previous work as a paid consultant to financial firms including Citigroup Inc. (C), Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. and hedge fund D.E. Shaw & Co.

Consulting work helped make Summers a wealthy man between the time he left government service in 2001 and when he returned in 2009...
Also not on Summers' resume is this: Summers in 2009, along with freshly elected Obama, who lashed out at Wall Street, calling bankers "fat cats" who don't get it, also slammed Wall Street. "Here is what I think they don't get...It was their irresponsible risk-taking in many cases that brought the economy to collapse," Mr. Summers said on CNN's State of the Union.

But I digress...

Madison Dearbon Partners & Rahm Emanual

As revealed by Peter Schweizer in his 2011 bombshell book, Throw Them All Out, “another 42 percent of First Wind is owned by Madison Dearborn Partners, the Chicago-based investment firm "with close ties [and friend] to then-White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanual."

It turns out that "the founder of the firm, David Canning, had been a bundler for George W. Bush. But he switched sides in 2008 and gave heavily to Obama. Madison Dearborn gave more to Emanual’s congressional campaigns than did any other business.”

Larry Rasky & Vice President Joe Biden

Back in July 2012, the GOP ran with this headline: "Biden Caught In The Cookie Jar." Yep, while The Green Corruption Files has been on top of the vice-president's participation in many of the green energy stimulus loans, this was when First Wind's taxpayer total was over $500 million in loans and grants. But as reflected in this report, First Wind has since scored at least $200 million more in special stimulus grants.

Furthermore, even as the GOP found that "Julia Bovey, First Wind's Director of External Affairs, was formerly Director of External Affairs for Obama's Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (June 2009 to June 2010)," there are much bigger fish here: Two key lobbyists.

First is Brownstein, Hyatt et al, who is primarily a Democrat friend and donor (with some Republicans in the mix), whereas, in 2010, reported the following:
First Wind, for its part, paid $150,000 in the first 6 months of 2009 to lobbyists at the firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP.  Disclosure forms indicate the firm lobbied the Energy and Treasury departments on behalf of First Wind in relation to the stimulus law. Brownstein Hyatt listed four lobbyists working on the case: a former Treasury department official, Michael Levy; a former Energy department official, C. Kyle Simpson; Michael McAdams, and Norman Brownstein. Mr. Brownstein goes back so far in Democratic politics that a New York Times article back in 1996 was already describing him as a "longtime Gore friend." This release from the Campaign Finance Institute reports that Mr. Brownstein pledged to raise $1 million for the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver at which Mr. Obama was nominated, over and above Mr. Brownstein's law firm partner Steven Farber's efforts as a co-chairman of the convention host committee.

Second, enter in Larry Rasky's lobbying firm with ties to the top. Reports claim that a month prior to the passing of the 2009-Recovery Act, on January 5, 2009, First Wind retained lobbyists Rasky Baerlein Strategic Communication. 

While this firm is also another big Democrat donor, Larry Rasky is "a longtime confidant and campaign strategist" of Vice President Joe Biden. Moreover, Rasky was a 2012 Obama bundler, and since Obama took office (as of July 2012), Rasky had visited the White House at least 21 times.

Between the two lobbying firms, First Wind dished out $465,000 in 2009, $360,000 in 2010 –– yet after 2011, they only maintained the services of Rasky.

Inside the $117 Million Energy Department Stimulus Deal 

First Wind was one of the four-sweetheart wind deals found in the DOE's junk bond portfolio that I highlighted in January 2013. While I'll spare repeating the cash and cronies, here is quick rundown of those four risky loans that were doled out via the 2009-Stimulus package (1705 Loan Program).

#1) Caithness Shepherds Flat for a wind project located in eastern Oregon
  • 11/12/2010: Fitch rating BBB-
  • December 2010: $1.3 billion partial loan guarantee 
  • Commenced operations in September 2012
  • JOBS: "The project directly created 400 construction jobs, in addition to 35 permanent jobs for the facility’s operation."

#2) Granite Reliable Power, LLC for a wind project in Coos, NH: 
  • 8/10/2011: Fitch rating BB 
  • September 2011: awarded a partial loan guarantee of $168.9 million. This project also got stimulus grants. 
  • Commenced operation in December 2011 
  • JOBS: "Work on the project created 198 construction jobs and six permanent jobs."

#3) Kahuku Wind Power, LLC (First Wind) for a wind project in Kahuku Oahu, HI 
  • 5/26/2010: Fitch rating BB+ 
  • July 2010: $117 million loan approved / February 3, 2012, Kahuku Wind Power, LLC snagged a 1603 grant­ for over $35 million  
  • Completed in March 2011 
  • JOBS: "The project created 200 jobs during construction. It also provides 10 permanent jobs for plant operations." 

#4) Record Hill Wind, LLC for a wind project in Roxbury, ME
  • 1/7/2011: S&P rating BB+ 
  • August 2011; awarded a $102 million loan, which was announced in March 2011. This project also got stimulus grants. 
  • The power plant has been operational since January 2012 
  • JOBS: "The project created 200 construction jobs and eight permanent jobs."
And let's not forget that last summer, the DOE heralded that they are ready to dish out billions more –– even a $150 million gamble on a controversial, expensive and risky offshore wind project. This is Cape Wind, which is also tied to a slew of high-profile Democrats –– a Green Corruption File unleashed last August. However, as of late (December 2014),, reported that the Cape Wind farm is in trouble.

Nevertheless, we'll stay focused on First Wind and its $117 million Energy Department loan, starting with a reminder that within the House Oversight leaked emails that were unleashed in the fall of 2012, is where evidence emerged that basically prove that the White House, Secretary Chu, and certain DOE Officials lied about how they handled the green energy loans on various fronts.

Inside the 350+ page Appendix II, there is a series of intriguing emails dated in May 2010where the DOE staff was discussing the Kahuku loan just months prior to the final approval that occurred in July 2010.

On May 12, 2010, LPO Credit Advisor James McCrea (at that time) was concerned about the Loan Guarantee Program Office's "credit policies and procedures." So much so that he intensely clarified the importance of order:
...everyone needs to understand is all that has to go in order to put the transaction into the Federal accounting system which requires collaborating among OMB, Treasury, and parts of DOE with which you do not normally interact. To be clear, one of the reasons this is so carefully handled is that there are several penalties for a violation of the Ant-deficiency Act including jail time...
Later McCrea writes:
I know the process is frustrating for First Wind. However, neither the Final Rule nor the Credit Policies and Procedures have changed in some time. The deal will close when it is time. Credit will do everything that it can to speed up the process but we do not have the ability, on our own, to ignore or modify either the Final Rule or the Policies and Procedures. At some point, when the transaction is closer to closing, there may come a time when it may be appropriate to work through Jonathan to collapse timetables a bit.

Five days later, McCrea writes:
 To fill Brian in, we have a pretty good mess on First Wind and it is looking like it is going to get a lot worse and quickly at that. Someone is pressing Jonathan [the former Executive Director of the Loan Program Office] who is now pressing hard on the everyone as the sponsor has an IPO in the works. I have told Jonathan that the deal has huge issues and the sponsor's overriding is not helping at all and that further, the sponsor's pending IPO is irrelevant.
While there's no mention of where that pressure came from, we do know that in July 2010, just two months after this email interaction, the DOE issued First Wind a $117 million loan guarantee.

This is also another case that flies in DIRECT contrast to what Jonathan Silver told (under oath) the House Oversight committee during the July 18, 2012 hearing on the green energy mess.  
Silver first informed the Committee: “This loan [Abound that went bust after Solyndra] –– like all the loans underwritten by career professionals, supported by outside specialists –– it was reviewed by career professionals from multiple executive branch offices.” “It was not rushed, the review took place over several years.” “It was not given to friends –– indeed no one in the Loan Program had any idea what individuals were involved in this [Abound] or any other transaction, nor did we care.”

After the questioning continued, Silver was asked if he saw any evidence of pay-to-play during his tenure. Silver concluded with this DENIAL: “None whatsoever, Sir — as I say, almost nobody that I am aware of in the Loan Program even knew who the individuals were who had invested, either directly or indirectly into these companies.”
By the way, Jonathan Silver, reported to be an Obama bundler, served as the Director of the Loans Programs Office at the DOE from November 2009 to early October 2011. Besides his powerful role inside the Energy Department, Silver has interesting connections that we've profiled many times –– even recently in chronicling the entire Solyndra Saga, which was unleashed last October.

While Silver has appeared at three oversight hearings (September 2011, July 2012, and September 2013) since is departure, this same hearing revealed Silver's shady email practices in handling the DOE deals (close to $40B worth), which at best, violates the Federal Records Act of 1950. Worse (and probable), something more sinister went on.

Nevertheless, his statements are far from the truth in the case of Abound, First Wind, and many others. In fact, President Obama's Energy Department has been a "Den of Deception."

And, as far as First Wind's IPO....

According to Schweizer, the First Wind "plan was to secure taxpayer money and then go public [paperwork filed in 2008]. But in October 2010, First Wind had to delay its IPO because of weak demand."

In fact, when the news hit about the struggling IPO, reported this: "Stock analysts say investors didn’t like the First Wind offering because the company had piled up a lot of debt and leaked cash. In fact, First Wind owes more than $500 million, loses money on a steady basis, and reports a negative cash flow."

The first part of First Wind's plan panned out: scoring over $700 million of taxpayer money, with only $117 million having to be paid back. However, no IPO yet. Still there are some deeply disturbing questions that need to be answered. With First Wind's debt being public knowledge since 2010, why did the Obama administration continue to give them hundreds of millions of taxpayer cash? And, is there still trouble in paradise? Or has corruption blown in?

SunEdison and its Big Wig Obama Cronies

Even though SunEdison didn't score the kind of taxpayer cash that First Wind has, it does have its fair share of high-powered political connections.

Goldman Sachs

First up is the fact that this "global provider of solar-energy services" was an early Goldman Sachs clean-energy investment. Moreover, as recent as April 2014, Goldman Sachs "provided $250 million toward" to SunEdison YieldCo, a newly formed yieldco vehicle wholly-owned by

From what I gather, SunEdison started getting "green" stimulus funds from the start. Reports quietly emerged that on September 22nd, 2009, "SunEdison receives its first grant under Section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act." A $992,000 grant was issued for a 443-kilowatt (KW) photovoltaic (PV) system at Owens Corning's facility in Kearny, New Jersey.

At that time, following this "award notification by the Department of Treasury
September 22, 2009 White House "clean-energy "summit"
that included SunEdison & First Wind
(DOT), Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Energy Secretary Steven Chu invited Carlos Domenech, Chief Operating Officer (COO) of SunEdison, to participate in a White House round-table meeting of select industry executives to discuss expanding development of clean, domestic sources of energy."

And so they did, along with other well-known winners of green energy money, including First Wind.

In filtering through the 1603 Grant Program spreadsheet that stops at the July 2013,  SunEdison was awarded 5 stimulus grants for "solar electricity" that ranges across 5 states, totaling over $1.8 million tax dollars. Now, it is unclear if the New Jersey one that they won in 2009, is related to the New Jersey one listed below. 
  1. California [docket #1325]: 4/29/13 SunEdison Residential Services for $465,886
  2. Massachusetts [docket #3997]: 2/28/13 SunEdison Residential Services for $600,377
  3. New Hampshire [docket #4744]: 2/28/13 SunEdison Residential Services for $13,304
  4. New Jersey [docket #6030]: 7/13/13 SunEdison Residential Services for $769,531
  5. New York [docket #6776]: 4/29/13 SunEdison Residential Services for $8,073

In case you haven't been following my work, Goldman Sachs that was mentioned earlier as a "friend" of Larry Summers, is the same Wall Street giant that was a top 2008 Obama donor. Additionally, two Goldman executives sat on Obama's 2008 Finance Committee, and a slew of executives bundled for both Obama's 2008 and 2012 campaigns.

Needless to say, since 2010, I've been following Goldman and tracking how this Big Bank –– now heavily involved in "green" ($40B) –– has been cashing in on the stimulus funds.

As of March 2013, Goldman Sachs (Alternative Energy Group) had an invested interest –– via various roles, and having entered the scene at different junctures (before, during and after taxpayer subsidies were awarded) –– in many projects and firms that received loans, grants and special tax breaks. So far, I've tracked at least 14 firms, which includes SunEdison, connecting Goldman to over $8.5 billion from the Green Bank of Obama, the majority from the 2009-Recovery Act.

Keep in mind too, that Goldman is associated  (former executives and investments) with the Big VC firm Kleiner Perkins as well as Generation Investment Management (GIM). As a reminder, Kleiner Perkins is where we find the "climate duo," whose combined carbon footprint is larger than my entire city: Billionaires John Doerr and Al Gore, both partners at the firm.

Obviously, Gore is a huge part of this green energy scam and he's "Making A Killing On Anti-Carbon Investment Hype" as well as his climate change fear-mongering, but recent history tells us that Doerr, who was "a very big-ticket Obama donor," is also a key player.

In January 2009, Doerr's persuasions were reflected in the 2009-Recovery Act via his "meetings with Obama's transition team and leaders in Congress" as well as the fact that he made "five recommendations to Congress and President-elect Barack Obama to jumpstart a green-tech revolution and fight global warming."

Meanwhile, back in 2004 Gore started GIM with former CEO of Goldman Sachs Asset Management David Blood, who is another Obama bundler. Apparently, Blood is the "wizard behind" GIM –– a "sustainable firm" where several former Goldman executives and partners exist, with Mr. Doerr joining the GIM advisory board in 2007.

Thus goes the tangled web of clean energy and the dirt that follows...

This and more insight were profiled in my January 8, 2013 Green Corruption File on Doerr and Gore, whose "Greentech Portfolio" (at least 50%) and GIM's "Sustainable Investing" secured billions in loans, grants and special tax breaks. Two years ago, I found that the two firms combined are tied to at least $10 billion from the taxpayer-funded Green Bank of Obama, the majority coming from the 2009-Recovery Act, of which Doerr had helped author. Meanwhile Goldman's $8.5 billion "green" footprint is documented here.

Still, Goldman Sachs is not the only SunEdison financial partner in the mix, as reflected on their site, and pictured left.

Tony Podesta: "The Lobbyist"

Another White House ally and direct tied to SunEdison is Tony Podesta –– dubbed "The Lobbyist" by Newsweek, and the founder and Chairman at the Podesta Group, which he started with his brother John Podesta in 1987.

John Podesta (Tony's bro) is the founder of the Center for American Progress (CAP), and as mentioned much earlier in this post, Larry Summers a Distinguished Senior Fellow at CAP.

In 2008 and early 2009, John Podesta, an Obama bundler, while still at CAP ran Obama’s transition team as the co-chair along side Valerie Jarrett and Peter Rouse. Meanwhile by 2011, Podesta stepped down from his CEO role and became the Chair of CAP and the CAP Action Fund –– only to leave CAP and join the White House at the end of 2013 in his new role as Obama's "executive power czar."

Now, over the course of unleashing this scandal, I've labeled CAP as "a dark, driving force behind President Obama's massive green energy scheme" which can be found in my March 2014 Green Corruption File. These are roles that range from legitimate to shady lobbying practices, to the fact that numerous CAP "fellows" were at the helm of the green energy deal making. They have held, and continue to hold key positions inside the Obama White House, his Green Team, and his Energy Department.

We can also add the fact that CAP donors in the renewable energy business have cashed in from
the green energy funds: at least 17 that I tracked last March, including Goldman Sachs.
What is directly relevant in this case is Tony Podesta. As documented by the Center for Responsive Politics, the Podesta Group's lobbying income went from $16,070,000 in 2008 to $25,780,000 in 2009, and has since significantly increased. Their client lists (past and present) includes large corporations such as Bank of America, BP America, and General Electric (GE aviation), General Motors, and Google (Computers/Internet) –– some also CAP donors, yet these firms that are now in the green energy business, also won a huge amount of cleantech funds from the Obama administration.

However, here is a brief list of  Podesta Group clients –– each carrying additional White House cronies as well as their very own green corruption tales –– that also raked in green taxpayer money: 

Additionally, in 2012, the Podesta Group added SunEdison to its list of clients, whereas they have been paid handsomely:

The Lobby Powerhouse: American Council on Renewable Energy 

It turns out too, that SunEdison is also a member of the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE), the renewable energy lobby powerhouse, of which in 2011, PJ Media had alerted the following:
Michael Eckhart and the ACORE membership also helped design the Department of Energy grant programs that partly offset the loss of tax equity financing arrangements. The tax equity financing schemes had been Wall Street’s main vehicle for bankrolling large wind and solar power plants, but they became moot when major losses …

Not only is ACORE in the "legislative writing business," but they are powerful champions and cheerleaders behind the Production Tax Credit (PTC), the "green" subsidy that was detailed earlier in this post.

This brings me to another reminder: Those individuals and groups that were involved in crafting the green energy sector of the 2009-Recovery Act, and who ultimately financially benefited directly (and/or the firms and friends they represent) from the $100 billion that was earmarked for renewable energy. This part of the clean-energy dirt was detailed a while ago here:  "The RAT in the Recovery and the Gang of Ten."

While my October 2013 post listed the fact that at least 29 members of ACORE cashed in at the Obama administration's (taxpayer-funded) green energy spending spree (loans, grants and PTC), it's worth noting that SunEdison is not the only ACORE member that is part of this Green Corruption File. We can add Goldman Sachs to the mix.

Obviously, this is crony capitalism run amok.

President Obama with John Podesa: Photo from Politico 

In closing...

With President Obama's "save the planet slush fund" at over $150 billion through 2014, the 1603 stimulus cash still pouring out, while his Energy Department is ready to dish out billions more, we know that his second term screams more "climate change."

This carries a serious and continuous fear-mongering campaign –– with even the Pope on board –– coupled with an "all of the above" strategy: rewarding his wealthy green cronies with taxpayer money, cramming through costly legislation, regulations and mandates as well as his Climate Action Plan. The latest attacks have come in the form of executive action –– and with a Republican controlled House and Senate this year, be prepared for Mr. Obama to use his "veto pen" as another "weapon of mass destruction."

But it's not all doom and gloom for 2015: "We the People" can stand up and fight the climate change deception as well as the devious and destructive crony capitalism that follows. 

Sunday, November 16, 2014

Not Enough Sun Shining at California Ivanpah Solar Plant: $1.6 billion shady stimulus deal tied to numerous wealthy Obama cronies now expect $539 million of free taxpayer cash

Photo: California Ivanpah Solar Plant from 
Have you heard the latest insanity on the green energy front? The "world's largest solar plant is applying for a federal grant to pay off their federal loan."

Yep, this is the Obama-backed Ivanpah Solar Plant that in 2011, snagged a $1.6 billion stimulus loan  –– and now they expect a bailout.

Worse is that, according to the Daily Signal, they "just might get it" –– $539 million of free taxpayer cash that is.

Just as I was about to retire from my political activism (exposing Green Corruption: The largest, most expensive and deceptive case of crony capitalism in American history), this outrageous development emerged. This is a project that I've tracked and written about at least seven times since April 2012, starting with this story that included my then-collaborator Marita Noon: "Shining the Light on BrightSource Energy's $1.6 Billion Shady DOE Deal."

Considering the length and depth of the cronyism and corruption at play here, I've unleashed much of what I'm about to share in various Green Corruption Files. However, compiling all the clean-energy dirt on this ONE deal will make your head explode. So, be prepared...

But before we hash out the past, let's take a peak at the current situation. Last weekend, Fox News reported the following:
After already receiving a controversial $1.6 billion construction loan from U.S. taxpayers, the wealthy investors of a California solar power plant now want a $539 million federal grant to pay off their federal loan.
In response to this green greed, Reason Foundation VP of Research Julian Morris, who was featured in this story, had this to say: 
This is an attempt by very large cash generating companies that have billions on their balance sheet to get a federal bailout, i.e. a bailout from us - the taxpayer for their pet project..." "It's actually rather obscene."
Fox News continues:
The Ivanpah solar electric generating plant is owned by Google and renewable energy giant NRG, which are responsible for paying off their federal loan. If approved by the U.S. Treasury, the two corporations will not use their own money, but taxpayer cash to pay off 30 percent of the cost of their plant, but taxpayers will receive none of the millions in revenues the plant will generate over the next 30 years.
Ivanpah is the largest concentrated solar power plant in the world. It was unveiled in February with great fanfare. Dr. Ernest Moniz, the U.S. Secretary of Energy, justified taxpayers' investment at the time, saying, "We want to be technology leaders. It's good for our economy and it’s also good for helping stimulate the global transition to low carbon."

Injured bird found at Ivanpah plant; photo from USA Today: 
Naturally, Dr. Moniz failed to mention anything about "how the project also functions as an avian death trap." Yep, what green energy advocates and animal activists should know is that Ivanpah has come under fire for their "bird executions and animal cruelty."

"Authorities were all aware that birds cannot withstand the furnace-like heat generated by the unprecedented collection of solar panels. Unfortunately, the 350,000 energy-culling mirrors make the whole think look like a glittering oasis, luring birds to the area, where they are burned to death in the searing heat," wrote The Wire in February, shortly after the Ivanpah Solar plant opened.

Meanwhile, BrightSource herald's themselves an environmental heroes because they paid $56 million to protect and relocate scores of desert tortoises. "But, even that has not been enough to avert catastrophe. Animals were crushed under vehicle tires, army ants attacked hatchlings in a makeshift nursery, and other calamities have befallen tortoises made vulnerable by the [Ivanpah] project," explained the Heartland Institute in 2012.

So, American taxpayers have funded this mass murder mess, but let's get back to the cash....

Apparently, this $539 million will be doled out via the 1603 stimulus grant program, which "offers renewable energy project developers cash payments in lieu of investment tax credits (ITC)" –– and as of October 15, 2014, has dished out $23 billion of taxpayer money. 

Nevertheless, the reason NRG is now pleading for free taxpayer cash is because the plant has not lived up to its clean-energy promise, blaming "the weather, saying the sun didn't shine as often as years of studies predicted..."

Oh, and I thought the Earth was burning up... 

The Mojave Desert plant, which "kicked off commercial operation at the tail end of December 2013, and for the eight-month period from January through August, its three units generated 254,263 megawatt-hours of electricity, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration data. That’s roughly one-quarter of the annual 1 million-plus megawatt-hours that had been anticipated," wrote in October.

Additionally, we find out via the Cato Institute that the following favoritism occurred: "In February, the company asked DOE for permission to delay payments on its loan. According to the Wall Street Journal, DOE gave Ivanpah a one-year extension on the $132 million first payment..." 

Lets not forget that back in 2011, NRG’s chief executive, David W. Crane had this to say:
"I have never seen anything that I have had to do in my 20 years in the power industry that involved less risk than these projects.” “It is just filling the desert with panels,” he added.
Risk, really?

It was the taxpayers that funded the majority of the $2B Ivanpah Solar Plant. And, now they want more government cash to pay off the $1.6 billion government loan –– with most predicting that "the odds of this application being fast-tracked to approval are looking good."

Why would this latest green energy boondoggle get special treatment? Because as Michelle Malkin points out: "Google execs and employees have been among the most generous Obama supporters in the corporate world..."

But that's just the beginning...

What most don't know is that this money grab is not new to the stimulus loans. This is known as "double dipping," where developers (sponsors and investors) of the stimulus-backed projects "gorged themselves on a multi-layered cake of federal, state and local subsidies" –– even to the point where they provided "little skin in the game," leaving taxpayer to foot the risk. 

This is reflected inside the March 2012 Oversight Report: The Department of Energy (DOE) Allowed “Double Dipping” – Multiple Subsidies to Single Projects," of which, just off the top of my head, at least half of the projects funded with stimulus loans, are guilty. In fact, in June 2012, Veronique de Rugy, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, during her testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which included an extensive report, gave this insight:
...there seems to be an even more troubling trend of “double dipping” by large companies that received loan guarantees from the DOE program. Many of the companies that have benefited from subsidized loans under the 1705 guarantee program also received additional grants under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).
Still, bailing out a pet project owned by mega companies like NRG Energy, Google and BrightSource Energy is egregious enough. However, what's critical to point out is that the original $1.6 billion was a bailout. Not to mention that, other than Google, there are numerous Obama cronies tied to the initial mega deal.

Moreover, Breitbart News was vindicated in their projections: 
...that Ivanpah risked being "Solyndra times three" because the sheer scale of the investment was not justified by the amount of energy the new solar project was expected to produce.

The level of wasted investment in Ivanpah is three times the amount of wasted tax payer money we gave to Solyndra. That is why Ivanpah equals Solyndra times three.
While risk is an important factor in this story, Ivanpah is Solyndra "times three" in other ways as well, which will be addressed in this Green Corruption File.

Ivanpah is Solyndra Times Three:  The cash, the cronyism and the corruption

My January 2014 "Cleantech Crash" documents the 32 Obama-backed green energy companies that have already gone under, costing taxpayers over $3 billion. However, there is also the "Troubled Watch List," which was presented in three categories, and included the 22 green energy companies/projects that have been problematic for some time, placing that figure at over $6.7 billion. At that time, there were also five bailouts (half by taxpayers and half by foreign-owned entities), of which American taxpayers have already spent $7.5 billion. This is where you'll find the short version of the BrightSource Energy shady deal, which is how the massive Ivanpah project got funded.

With the Obama administration spending over $150 billion through 2014 to "save the planet," this tally doesn’t factor in the numerous DOE funded projects that are still in the shadows, nor my blistering story on the "law-breaking, American hating" Spanish conglomerate Abengoa, that was subsidized with over $3.6 billion in stimulus loans and grants from the U.S. taxpayer. Also, this total does not calculate the tens of billions spent on other non-stimulus clean-energy deals that I've been tracking, nor the stimulus-created and/or funded programs that also flopped, costing billions more.

Nevertheless, the BrightSource story does include a significant amount of cronyism, including ties to a slew of President Obama friends as well as Vice President Joe Biden and Senator Harry Reid.

In the case of Reid, there are more details that can found in my Green Corruption File on Reid's clean-energy dirt, which chronicles how the senator from Nevada is directly linked to over $3 billion in green energy stimulus loans, including BrightSource Energy.

This Ivanpah deal comprises of big donors, political cronies and connections such as BrightSource Energy, VantagePoint, Google, NRG Energy, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bechtel Corporation, George Soros, the former Commerce Secretary John Bryson, McBee Strategic Consulting, and others –– with DOE officials, Obama’s Green Team, and several in Congress from the Democrat side involved.

It doesn’t hurt that some helped craft the 2009-stimulus package –– even as many of the parties involved frequented the White House during the DOE loan review process. All this access and influence, and you’ve got yourself a recipe for guaranteed success –– at least, despite the high risk, in securing the taxpayer cash.

Even as this solar plant officially opened in February 2014, what's important to point out is that on February 22, 2010, the original loan was issued to BrightSource Energy –– a solar company that is still a key owner of the Ivanpah Solar Plant ––  a massive project that created a whopping 1000 construction and 86 permanent jobs.

According to Forbes, BrightSource has some history: "It was founded in 2004 by American-Israeli pioneer Arnold Goldman, whose Luz International built nine solar thermal power plants in the Mojave Desert in the 1980s and 1990s.”

What transpired in the middle may or may not be relevant, but what is important is that as early as April 2008, BrightSource formed a partnership with  (PG&E) when they "entered into a series of contracts... for renewable solar power" –– which included the already planned "100 MW in Ivanpah in California."

By May 2009, a new agreement emerged:
BrightSource Energy has inked contracts with the Pacific Gas and Electric to sell the utility electricity from solar-thermal power farms with a total of 1.31 gigawatts in capacities. 
The agreements would replace the one PG&E previously signed with BrightSource last year for up to 900-megawatts of solar-thermal power, both companies said. The new agreements call for building seven solar-thermal plants. 
BrightSource's ability to demonstrate the company's technology through its power project in Israel's Negev Desert played a role in convincing PG&E to expand its power purchases, said BrightSource CEO John Woolard in an interview after the announcement Wednesday. BrightSource's technical team includes those who built a series of solar-thermal power plants totally 354 megawatts in California in the 1980s.
Along the way, this project was one of seven solar and geothermal power companies that "received quick approval and little scrutiny from the Department of Interior to lease federal lands in California and Nevada in no-bid processes," which was exposed by The Washington Free Beacon, yet we covered in our 2012 Special Seven Series.

Then sometime in October 2010, during the time of their DOE loan process, "NRG joined with BrightSource Energy as lead investor ($300 million) on the under-construction Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in California."

On January 25, 2011, Fitch had rated the BrightSource deal "speculative" at best. This transaction was part of the Department of Energy's "junk bond portfolio," which was documented inside the March 20, 2012 House Oversight Report –– and where, shortly thereafter,  I tried to alert the masses.  This astonishing report revealed that 22 (out of 26) projects from the 1705 Loan Guarantee Program, which was created under the 2009 stimulus package, were basically garbage. In fact, according to this report, "Overall, DOE’s 1705 portfolio’s initial unweighted average rating was BB-, which is considered “Junk grade.”

Despite the obvious risk, between 2009 and 2011, the DOE doled out $16 billion of taxpayer money to projects that were rushed by the Obama White House for political reasons. However, by October 2013, the DOE closed two defunct stimulus loan guarantees: Prologis that was awarded $1.4 billion for Project Amp and SoloPower Inc for $197 million –– because, as predicted prior to the loans, both ended up failures. 

Needles to say, we can confirm that virtually all of the winners have meaningful political connections to the president and other high-ranking Democrats and/or their rich cronies –– in many cases to both and in some cases to multiple “friends."

But as far as BrightSource, the Wall Street Journal, in June 2012, documented the fact that in March 2011, DOE was well aware that the company was suffering major financial issues: 
In a PowerPoint presentation sent to the DOE in March 2011 and viewed by The Wall Street Journal, BrightSource said its cash position was "precarious" [meaning dangerously likely to fall or collapse] and that it would be a "major embarrassment" for the administration if it went under because the White House had held it up as a centerpiece of its green-energy push. "The DOE will be known as responsible for a very high-profile failure," the message read.

Factor in Google, which had made a $10 million equity investment in BrightSource in 2007. Then on April 11, 2011, the day that the Department of Energy finalized this huge deal, Google announced its largest investment in renewable energy to date: $168 million into the Ivanpah project.

This $1.6 billion loan went toward financing for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, and was issued to the California Company BrightSource Energy and their partners. At the time it was finalized, more high-powered players entered the field when Jack Jenkins-Stark, Chief Financial Officer for BrightSource Energy, stated the following:
In partnership with the DOE, NRG, Bechtel and now Google, we’re building at Ivanpah cost-effective, environmentally friendly and reliable solar power plants. We’re thrilled to work with two of America’s leading utilities – PG&E and Southern California Edison – to provide their customers with clean, reliable and cost-effective solar power at a meaningful scale. 
And, David Crane, President and CEO of NRG Energy had this to say:
Ivanpah is a glowing example of truly sustainable energy—a project that all at once will ensure cleaner air, help in the fight against climate change, drive down the cost of large scale concentrating solar technology and take California one giant step closer toward its goal of producing 33% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020.
Much more on Mr. Crane later, but I hope that he got the memo: Ivanpah is not doing so well...

But in reality, this 2010/2011 $1.6 billion DOE deal was a bailout, which is a clear violation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. In fact, other than the Wall Street Journal, Peter Schweizer, in his bombshell book, Throw Them All Out, describing the financial issues they were having, wrote this: "BrightSource badly needed this infusion of taxpayer cash" –– a fact that we elaborated on many times.

Key Players: BrightSource Energy, Google, VantagePoint Capital Partners, PG&E, McBee Strategic Consulting, and NRG Energy 

BrightSource Energy 

BrightSource Energy has an array of Big Wig investors that happen to be high-powered Obama donors such as Google, Morgan Stanley, and BP Alternative Energy as well as VantagePoint Capital Partners.

While Morgan Stanley was a #19 of Obama's top 2008 donors (organizations' PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families), contributing $528,182 to get the senator from Chicago elected, BP was also a major Obama contributor. According to POLITICO in 2010, "Obama was the biggest recipient of BP cash." 
BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics
On a side note: a while ago, BrightSource partnered with Spain’s Abengoa Solar on the most ambitious solar power tower project yet planned: the controversial two-tower, 500-megawatt Palen Solar Electric Generating System located in California.

Abengoa is Spanish conglomerate that has been screwing over American taxpayers, workers and vendors, using the billions of American green energy stimulus funds that they were awarded by the Obama administration –– and all on U.S. soil. A story brought to light by droves of brave whistleblowers, who this year, exposed the rampant corruption inside Spain's Abengoa. In short, since snagging billions of American taxpayer money, Abengoa has intentionally violated American laws, codes and regulations that range across numerous government agencies, while on so many levels demonstrating a blatant disregard for our country and our citizens.

Yet, it seems that there is trouble in paradise because about two weeks ago, it was announced that
"Abengoa is Acquiring BrightSource Energy's Interest in Palen Solar Energy Generating Station Project."


Google plays the political game well: it's all about access and influence, starting with campaign contributions. Google’s $814,540 contribution to then-Senator Obama’s campaign made it the fifth largest donor in 2008, and in 2012 moved up to the number three spot with a whopping $805,119. Furthermore, Google's CEO at the time, Eric Schmidt, served as an informal advisor to President Obama. Schmidt, Google Executive Chairman, was also an Obama donor in 2008, and since April 2009, is (was) a member of the president's Science and Technology Advisory Council (PCAST).

Another Google political connection is Dan Reicher, director of climate and energy initiatives at Google, who was one of the founders of Cleantech and Green Business Leaders for Obama. There are additional interesting folks behind the Google scenes such as John Doerr, who has served as a member of Google's board of directors since May 1999. 

According to Michelle Malkin, "Google co founder Sergey Brin, Chief Legal Officer and Senior Vice President David Drummond, and Google Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist Vint Cerf are all vocal Obama supporters and top donors."

Meanwhile, Google co-founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, invested in Tesla Motors that snagged a $465 million Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) loan, which was part of the "favored five" crony car story we've been tracking as well  –– with two going down so far: Fisker Automotive ($529 million) and The Vehicle Production Group LLC ($50 million).

Like many of these Big VC's, their "cleantech" investments overlap. In fact, I briefly touched on Google in my January 2012 Green Corruption File on Al Gore and John Doerr, who is also part of the Google team and a 2009-stimulus author. At that time, I revealed that Doerr's Big VC firm Kleiner Perkins, where Gore is also a partner, and along with the Kleiner Perkins collaboration with Gore's London based Generation Investment Management (GIM), they are tied to at least $10 billion of Obama's taxpayer funded green energy spending spree.

After some leg work, I discovered that Google Ventures –– via their "Energy Investments" and other "green deals" that I tracked down, as of September 2013, had ten verified stimulus deals (as well as other Obama green funds) in their back pocket, including the BrightSource/Ivanpah project, which placed their investment score at close to $5 billion of taxpayer cash. This figure does not include Silver Spring Networks and their connection to $1.3 billion in smart-grid stimulus grants that I divulged a few times. 


Other than investors, there are additional powerful players from BrightSource and PG&E found behind this massive DOE deal, which include the following:
  • John Woolard, then CEO of BrightSource
  • John Bryson, then-BrightSource chairman
  • Peter Darbee, then-CEO and chairman of Pacific Gas and Electric 
  • Bernie Toon, who served then-Senator Joe Biden as his Chief of Staff, and became a lobbyist for BrightSource Energy on March 6, 2011

John Woolard, during the time of the loan review process, was the president and CEO of BrightSource, as well as shareholder in the company. It seems too, that Woolard, from 2005 to 2006, was part of VantagePoint –– another VC firm that will be addressed later. After his role as CEO that began in September 2006, until his resignation in May 2013, he briefly served as a director at BrightSource. And check this out, according to his Linked-In page, since July 2014, he has been Vice President at Google –– meaning Woolard still has a hand in this deal.

A while ago, the Washington Free Beacon reported that "Senator Harry Reid received almost $4,000 from BrightSource executives in the 2010 cycle, including $2,400 from then-CEO John Woolard. Also, in August 2010, Woolard, and then-chairman of PG&E Corporation, Peter Darbee hosted a breakfast fundraiser for Senator Reid in the Oakland offices of BrightSource Energy. Still, Woolard was not only a Reid fundraiser, but also an Obama donor that has visited the White House dozens of times since this president took office.

What's directly relevant is that the firm was part of an intense push in 2011 that involved meaningful Democrat connections –– donors, investors, and stakeholders –– as well as correspondences with President Obama, the White House and DOE Officials.

A March 16 2012 hearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee revealed that Woolard used his connections to try to get a “commitment” for the DOE loan for BrightSource — despite the fact that then-Energy Secretary Chu has repeatedly said the loans were based on merit. During the hearing, Woolard said: “I believe that everything we did in our project was fully on the merits. It was a very solid project.”

However, a series of emails involving Mr. Woolard show him interacting with decision-makers in the administration seeking political influence. The House Oversight Chairman Issa told The Hill: “Clearly we have a discovery of emails showing there was direct conversation intended by the people having those conversations to be lobbying all the way up to and including President Obama.”

These particular emails reveal communications between Woolard and Matt Rogers and between Woolard and Jonathan Silver.

In case you haven't been following my work, Matt Rogers, from January 2009 until September 2010, served as Senior Advisor to Energy Secretary Steven Chu. Rogers oversaw the disbursement of tens of billions of dollars in stimulus funds for renewable energy projects. Meanwhile, Jonathan Silver served as the Director of the Loans Programs Office at the DOE from November 2009 to early October 2011. Besides powerful roles inside the Energy Department, both Rogers and Silvers have interesting connections, of which we've profiled many times –– even recently in chronicling the entire Solyndra Saga, which was unleashed late last month.


The January 2010 EMAIL is where John Woolard (as mentioned above, who was then the CEO of BrightSource), told the DOE of Obama's involvement when he was pushing for a conditional commitment.
"Darbee at PG & E talked directly to Obama about the program's challenges and the bad situation it puts him in," Woolard emailed to Matt Rogers
At the hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, emphasized to Woolard that PG& E and Darbee “had a vested interest in getting this thing approved because you were providing them their required commitment for green power.”

Yep, because the “stakeholder” here is Peter Darbee, then-CEO and chairman of PG&E –– and PG&E, remember, had developed a 2008 partnership with BrightSource. Further, when the "three-plant Ivanpah Solar Complex" was moving forward, it was also announced that, "Electricity from the project will be sold under long-term power purchase agreements with Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison Company (SCE)."

What you need to understand is that PG&E, a strong Obama and Democrat donor, is all over this clean-energy scheme. They are jammed-packed with Washington "cronies," including Cathy Zoi, who is the "most controversial former PG&E employee to hold an influential government." Zoi, an Al Gore acolyte, who was a DOE Insider from 2009 until 2011, is directly tied to many green corruption deals that have been addressed in various files.

Moreover, as reported by the Washington Free Beacon a while back, "PG&E has become an aggressive buyer of power supplied by solar, wind, and other renewable sources, in large part due to statutory requirements under California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard, which mandated that 20 percent of the utility’s electricity come from renewable sources by 2010 — and 33 percent by 2020."

Considering that this mega electric firm has high-powered connections all the way up to the president as well as inside the DOE, PG&E won a significant amount of stimulus money for various projects, but more relevant to this case is that PG&E has an invested interest in seven of the Energy Department stimulus loans, totaling over $7.6 billion of taxpayer money.

While the details into these taxpayer-funded projects can be found in my April 2013 post, here's the breakdown: 
  1. Agua Caliente Solar Power Project located in Yuma, Arizona, of which "PG&E will purchase the project’s power and deliver it to customers in California." Project by NRG Solar: $967 million loan guarantee
  2. BrightSource Energy development located in Baker, CA, of which "electricity from the project will be sold under long-term power purchase agreements with Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison Company (SCE)." Project by NRG Energy, Inc. (BrightSource): $1.6 billion loan guarantee
  3. California Valley Solar Ranch of which the 250-megawatt is under construction in eastern San Luis Obispo County, and "is generating clean, reliable solar power for transmission over PG&E’s utility grid." Project by NRG Solar and SunPower is still involved: $1.237 billion loan guarantee
  4. Desert Sunlight Project located in Riverside, CA, with the PPA (purchase power agreement) listed as Southern California Edison and PG&E. This is a First Solar Project that is co-owned by NextEra Energy Resources, GE Energy Financial Services, and Sumitomo Corporation of America: partial guarantee of $1.46 billion
  5. Genesis Solar Energy Project located in Riverside County, CA of which "power from the project will be sold to Pacific Gas and Electric Company." Project by NextEra Energy Resources, LLC: partial guarantee of $852 million loan
  6. Mesquite Solar 1, LLC located in Maricopa County, AZ, of which Bloomberg News had reported at the time the DOE loan was approved, "Sempra will sell electricity from the Mesquite Solar 1 plant to California’s largest utility, PG&E Corp., under a 20- year contract." Project by Sempra Mesquite: $337 million loan guarantee
  7. Mojave Solar located in San Bernardino County, CA, of which at the time of the DOE loan approval (September 2011), "Abengoa signed a power-purchase agreement with PG&E to buy the energy produced by the project for a period of 25 years." Project by the Spanish firm Abengoa Solar, Inc.: $1.2 billion loan guarantee
PG&E is also a major player inside “Smart Gird, Dirty Devices," which exposes their partnership with Silver Spring Networks on many fronts (PG&E is their top customer) –– the lucky smart-grid technology company who has an array of White House connections –– Foundation Capital, Kleiner Perkins and Google –– of which, as of January 2013, I found that Silver Spring is linked to at least $1.3 billion in smart-grid stimulus grants.

Since PG&E became an energy client of the top DC lobbyists, McBee Consulting, in 2011, they are also profiled in my September 2013 Green Corruption File.


The March 7, 2011, Woolard/Silver EMAIL asked Silver to look over a letter drafted by Woolard, who as noted, was president and CEO of BrightSource at that time, and John Bryson, that requested direct White House influence in BrightSource’s loan guarantee application. The letter, intended for then-White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley, said the following:
“We need a commitment from the WH to quarterback loan closure between OMB and DOE.” It also included a request for “guidance and support from the White House.” According to testimony from Woolard, the email was never submitted.
In case you don't know John Bryson, let me shed some light on this man. Bryson was BrightSource's chairman of the board prior to his appointment as Secretary of Commerce with the Obama White House in May 2011 –– just a month after the loan was approved. Although Bryson officially began his"commerce post" in October 2011, he resigned in June 2012 following a series of mysterious auto accidents. 

The Washington Free Beacon reported in 2012, “According to financial disclosures, Bryson had up to $500,000 in stock options from BrightSource and a $700,000 advisory fee from Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, an investment group that has bought a number of solar farms in California. He was also the CEO of Edison International, which obtained exclusive power purchase agreements for four of the solar projects, at the time the awards were issued.”

Bryson also has ties to the left-wing radical organization the Apollo Alliance via an environmental activist group, the Natural Resources Defense Council, which he co-founded. There is also the fact that in June 2011, Aaron Klein of World Net Daily, reported that "Bryson is co-chair of the Pacific Council on International Policy, a globalist organization whose members can be found throughout the Obama administration."

While Apollo and the Natural Resources Defense Council have funding connections to the politically powerful left-wing billionaire George Soros, what interesting to point out is that both Apollo and Soros helped craft the 2009-stimulus package –– a trillion-dollar influx of taxpayer cash that eventually bailed out BrightSource. And, Soros is also connected to the Ivanpah project via another avenue that will be tackled later in this post.

During the July 18, 2012 Oversight Hearing regarding Obama’s green energy failures, Silver acknowledged that he had known Mr. Bryson for many years, and also admitted to making a few "modest edits" to this particular email asking for White House intervention, which, apparently came from his private email account.

More astonishing is that during the course of that same "Oversight Hearing," it was revealed that Silver and others inside the DOE, had a “habit” of using personal email accounts to conduct DOE business, which clearly violates at least the “spirit” of the Federal Records Act of 1950 as well as hampers any type of transparency and accountability.

Still, one month after the March 7, 2011 email exchange, asking for direct White House influence, whereas both Woolard and Silver claimed that the email was never sent, the $1.6 billion federal loan guarantee was approved with a handful of reporters taking note:
  • The Washington Post stated, “venture capitalists who held advisory roles with the Energy Department were given access to Obama’s top advisers.” 
  • The Washington Examiner report, “President Obama discussed the Department of Energy loan program with a stakeholder dependent on the DOE, and the conversation appears to have expedited the process.”
Even so, others will give the credit to Bernie Toon, who served then-Senator Joe Biden as his Chief of Staff, and became a lobbyist for BrightSource on March 6, 2011. According to the Wall Street Journal, “BrightSource spent more than $500,000 on lobbying in the third quarter of 2010 through the second quarter of 2011” –– and $40,000 of the lobbying money went to Toon.

The Journal also noted the following: "Mr. Toon was hired because he had previously lobbied for BrightSource contractor Bechtel Corp. [profiled a bit later] and was familiar with the project..."

What interesting too are these two White House visits noted by The Journal:
On March 9, 2011, just days after being hired, Mr. Toon went to the White House with three BrightSource executives, according to Senate and White House records. There he visited a former colleague, Alan Hoffman, now the top aide to Mr. Biden, whose office was working on green-energy programs, the records show...

Another visit came March 15, when BrightSource executives went to the White House for a meeting with the Office of Management and Budget, which also was reviewing the loan, White House records show...
While Toon's contract ended shortly thereafter, April 6, 2011, the BrightSource loan was finalized on April 11, 2011. However, the BrightSource push started as early as September 2009, which involved the top DC lobbyists McBee Strategic Consulting –– as reflected in the House Oversight leaked EMAILS that were unleashed late October 2012.

By the way, these  emails are a treasure trove of "DOE Intel" that we have been revealing since their release that not only confirm corruption and deceit inside the DOE, but they implicate more BrightSource executives and stakeholders, DOE officials as well as Obama’s Green Team and several in Congress from the Democrat side were "in on" the $1.6 billion shady deal.

Stay tuned, because that evidence will be exposed in this Green Corruption File under the section entitled, Inside the BrightSource, DOE Incriminating Emails: Access & Influence. But for now, I need to lay down some more groundwork.

VantagePoint Capital Partners 

VantagePoint is a huge VC firm, where we find DOE Insider Sanjay Wagle, who prior to arriving in Washington was a principal at this firm. From June 2009 to November 2011, Wagle served as Renewable Energy Advisor to the Energy Department, under then-Energy Secretary Chu.

His UC Berkeley bio, states: "At DOE, Sanjay served in the Office of the Secretary of Energy helping to oversee implementation of $11 billion in programs for clean energy. Sanjay also served as Associate Director for Commercialization at the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E), the newly created agency funding high-risk, high reward energy technologies."

Wagle was an Obama fundraiser in 2008; rallying support through a group he headed known as Clean Tech for Obama. According to the Washington Post, "Shortly after Obama’s [2008] election, he left his California firm to join the Energy Department, just as the administration embarked on a massive program to stimulate the economy with federal investments in clean-technology firms."

While some greentech defenders, claim that "Wagle gave up any interests in VantagePoint and the companies it invested in before joining the DOE," we do know that Wagle, on September 22, 2009, was part of Valerie Jarrett's "CLEAN ENERGY SUMMIT" held at the White House, whereas it was reported that "attendees struck gold, cashing in on $5.3 billion in taxpayer funds from the Obama administration."

This data was dated June 5, 2012, and is a collective tally. But my research, dated September 2013, proves that VantagePoint did "strike gold." At least nine clean-energy firms/projects listed on their CLEANTECH PORTFOLIO, which includes the BrightSource deal and two other DOE loans, came out winners in the 2009 "green" stimulus spending spree, placing their total, at that time, at about $3 billion of taxpayer money.

"Bobby K" & Steve McBee 

Besides Wagle, there are two additional VantagePoint players worthy of exposure, because they are found inside the wheeling and dealing that went on behind closed doors. First is one of climate change’s loudest activists, who "wants a law to punish global warming skeptics," but is just another loud liberal who refuses to change his Eco-lifestyle –– which is code for hypocrite.

Known as “Bobby K," Mr. Kennedy is more than an Eco-fascists, he has been and continues to be a Partner and Senior Advisor at VantagePoint, and was directly implicated in the BrightSource Energy $1.6 billion shady DOE deal via internal Energy Department emails as well as via his VC Firm, which I'll get to later.

The other is Steve McBee, who is the founder and CEO of McBee Strategic Consulting –– and also a Senior Advisor at VantagePoint. From what I gather, McBee has been lobbying on VantagePoint's behalf since 2009. However, McBee has additional green energy clients that are also part of the Ivanpah $1.6 billion DOE deal: BrightSource Energy from 2009 to 2012; Google hired McBee Consulting sometime in 2009; and PG&E hired McBee Consulting in 2011. 

Top D.C. Lobbyist McBee Strategic Pushed Loan as Early as December 2009 

Due to Steve McBee's significant role in shaping the Energy Department loan structure, as well as ensuring that the Ivanpah project secured the DOE money, I thoroughly analyzed his firm in my September 2013 Green Corruption FileTop D.C. Lobbyist McBee Strategic Consulting “opened the spigot of green corporate welfare;” then billions of stimulus cash flooded the firm’s energy clients. 

In short: Since 2002, McBee Strategic Consulting has financially supported both sides of the political isle, with a huge increase in campaign contributions in the 2008, 2010 and 2012 cycles. However they have given predominately, and more significantly to Democrats.

What's key is that in March 2011, Tim Carney of the Washington Examiner, made this charge:
K Street is the epicenter of this green-industrial complex, and ground zero might be the firm founded by Democratic revolving-door earmark lobbyist Steve McBee, who reportedly wrote key provisions in the stimulus bill to open the spigot of green corporate welfare.
As Carney noted in 2011 the following:
With McBee's former boss being a senior Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, McBee Strategic used to be an earmark factory. After Obama's election, though, McBee pivoted to green energy and saw revenues soar in 2009.

Yes indeed, revenues for McBee soared, which as documented by Center for Responsive Politics –– not all from clean-energy, but plenty of dirt to share–– it seems that McBee Strategic Consulting total lobbying income went from just under $5 million in 2005, then doubled to just over $11 million in 2009, and it peaked in 2010 and 2011, topping $13 and $12.8 million each of those years. And, they continue to spend big bucks on lobbying.

But if we go back in time when the 2005 energy bill created a new Department of Energy loan guarantee program for renewable energy facilities, it's important to note that in order to protect taxpayers, the 2005 law required from the beneficiary a sort of "down payment" to cover the risk of default. Yet, as reported and confirmed by Carney, “The 2009 stimulus bill removed that requirement, allowing DOE to give out loan guarantees without the down payment. Energy lobbyists on Capitol Hill say that this provision, which opened the spigot on the DOE loans, was written by Steve McBee.”

Nevertheless, my research reflects 31 McBee energy clients with 19 (over 60 percent) that received green-government subsidies under the Obama administration, totaling approximately $13.7 billion of taxpayer money, which includes the $1.6 billion BrightSource deal. Additionally, with only two clients (Honeywell and Tesla) that were hired prior to 2009, when the Recovery Act was approved, I calculated that from these 31 energy clients, McBee Strategic Consulting "green kickbacks," as of September 2013, were close to $9 million.

As noted, one of those clients was BrightSource, which retained McBee from 2009 until 2012, making way more money than Bernie Toon: $40k vs. $480k.

Inside the BrightSource, DOE Incriminating Emails: Access & Influence 

Before we dig into those incriminating emails –– and because context is key –– let's first recap some important dates surrounding this massive green deal:
  • 2007: Google made a $10 million equity investment in BrightSource. 
  • April 2008, BrightSource formed a partnership with (PG&E), and continued on... 
  • February 2009, Recovery Act signed into law by President Obama 
  • From 2009 until 2012, BrightSource retained the lobbying forces of the Top D.C. Lobbyist McBee Strategic Consulting
  • Prior to September 2009: Obviously, BrightSource had submitted an application at least this early, which is reflected inside DOE internal emails. 
  • February 22, 2010, the original loan guarantee was issued to BrightSource Energy
  • Sometime in October 2010, during the time of their DOE loan process, "NRG joined with BrightSource Energy as lead investor ($300 million) on the under-construction Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in California."
  • December 7, 2010: NRG chief executive David Crane met with White House official Valerie Jarrett in the West Wing. 
  • On January 25, 2011, Fitch had rated the BrightSource deal "speculative" at best. 
  • In March 2011, it is well documented that the DOE was well aware BrightSource was suffering with major financial issues.
  • From March 6, 2011 until April 6, 2011, BrightSource secured the services of lobbyists (via FIRST Group) Bernie Toon, the former Chief of Staff then-Senator Joe Biden 
  • April 11, 2011, (some say April 6th) the $1.6 billion Department of Energy loan was finalized, which enabled "BrightSource Energy and its partners—NRG and Google—to build the world’s largest solar thermal facility."
  • April 11, 2011, the day that the Department of Energy finalized this huge deal, Google announced its largest investment in renewable energy to date: $168 million into the Ivanpah project.

On September 29, 2009, then-CEO of BrightSource John Woolard had written an EMAIL to Sanjay Wagle, with the subject line "Steve Chu email?"
Sanjay –– I need to send a note to Matt R and Secretary about our situation and my only email for Dr Chu is old lbnl address. Can you please send his new email?
Related to this, will likely be in DC again this week if you can free up for a beer (or am coffee)? JW

NOTE: "Matt R" is Matt Rogers, the DOE Advisor, and Sanjay Wagle is the DOE Insider, big Obama supporter, who prior to arriving in Washington was a principal at VantagePoint –– both profiled earlier.

In a December 8, 2009 EMAIL with the subject line "Bobby K, please read," which was also labeled "Importance: High," is where we find an interaction between Woolard and Kris Courtney, where she writes: 
Call Bobby when you have a moment. He spoke with Carol Browner, who spoke with DOE and DOE promised a call back to you/BSE within 24 hours. He also spoke with Ed Markey. Wants you to call him so he can brief you.
Response from Woolard: 
Just got scheduled with Chu at 5:15 today for a call - JW
Response from Natalie Shaefer:
Great - when should we move our McBee call to?
Woolard answer:
 5:45 should work

“Bobby K” is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is a partner and Senior Adviser at VantagePoint, profiled earlier. 

Carol Browner, a 2008 Obama bundler, was a member of the Obama-Biden Transition Team that heavily influenced the 2009 Recovery Act, amongst other key Obama legislation.  Browner, who directed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) during the Clinton administration, is an Al Gore acolyte, as well as an environmental extremist with a few left-wing radical ties on her secret resume. 

Later Browner became part of Obama's 2009 Green Team as the Climate Czar, and was part of the decision-making process with the Energy Department loan program –– only to abruptly resign in early 2011. Prior to her tenure at the Obama White House, Browner was a founding board member (from 2003-2008) for CAP, where she currently sits as a Distinguished Senior Fellow.

Ed Markey, the Democrat Senator for Massachusetts, is another climate change crusader. From 2007-2010 he served as Chair of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, and he was also the co-sponsor of the failed 2009 cap-and-trade bill. In 2013, Markey also introduced a bill that would force people nationwide to buy green energy: The American Renewable Energy and Efficiency Act, of which, from what I gather, was referred to committee in July of this year.

When Rep. Markey began his mission to fill Secretary of State John Kerry’s Senate seat, he was endorsed by many green groups, and according to the Daily Caller, his “2013 Senate campaign received large amounts of funding from environmental groups” –– and Markey is connected to the new DOE deal that I wrote about in August: Another Taxpayer-funded ‘Green’ Gamble: Energy Department doles out $150 million to Cape Wind’s expensive, risky offshore wind project tied to high-profile Democrats.


Inside the 350+ page Appendix II, there is ongoing interaction and pressure from the heavy weight K Street firm McBee Strategic Consulting, profiled above.

In an EMAIL dated December 20, 2009, there is a very suspicious email exchange about BrightSource that included John Woolard again (the former CEO), Joshua Bar-Lev the Vice President Regulatory Affairs for BrightSource, and the lobbying firm representing BrightSource, McBee Strategic Consulting –– with well as some unknown Democrats that are tied to energy-related issues:
In 2009, Steve McBee alerted the masses with the following EMAIL:  
Wanted to let you know that the BrightSource application appears to moving apace at OMB and has a fighting chance of getting over to DOE...
DOE is another story. We are hearing that despite a strong push by Silver, Spinner, Rogers and others internally, the process is getting sideways by any number of bureaucratic hold ups and there is now real potential for consideration of the project to slip until next year.

NOTE: We've establish the roles of Silver and Rogers in this post, but in case you haven't been following this green energy scam, Steve Spinner is key: he was the Department of Energy Loan Programs Advisor, from April 2009 to September 2010.

While a complete bios, their connections and collusion on each of these three are found in my last post, Ebola: Solyndra is dead and politics is alive, here is the short version: Steve Spinner, a two-time Obama bundler, not only worked for Obama's 2008 Transition Team, he also was part the president's 2012 reelection campaign, serving as a California finance chair and founded "Technology for Obama (T4O).” 

Spinner was also handpicked to make a cameo appearance at the 2012 Democratic National Convention, along with other wealthy Obama green cronies: Steve Westly, Tom Steyer, and Jim Rogers. And while in April 2009, Spinner was appointed as the DOE Loan Programs Advisor to then-Energy Secretary Steven Chu, by September 2010, he left the DOE and about that same time joined CAP as a Senior Fellow until October 2011.


The next paragraph, Steve McBee undermines the "integrity of the Loan Guarantee Program, and then writes that if the project slips to 2011, that there is a strong likelihood that the project will be “redeployed to China..."

McBee continues:
ANYTHING you guys would be willing to do with DOE in terms of moving the process would be deeply appreciated.
Joshua Bar-Lev in response says:
Do you all think we should have vantage point insist on mtg with chu or silver or rodgers? Should john or I try to fly out for something similar? Looking for some game changer but perhaps we’ve done all we could. Is dc shut down by the snow or is there some impact we could make? Joshua
It seems that 2010 was a busy year for the BrightSource players, because other than the January 2010 Woolard/Rogers email to get Jonathon Silver’s assistance, as well as Peter Darbee’s meeting with President Obama divulged much earlier, there were more.

EMAIL: On January 13, 2010, with the subject "DOE Loan Guarantee," Joshua writes to Steven L. Kline and cc’s John Woolard:
Steve, would have a few minutes to discuss both 1) status of our efforts with DOE, and then 2) our strategy of trying to meet with 3-4 members (Reid, Boxer, Bingaman, maybe Feinstein) in early February to either say ‘huge problem, need your help’ or ‘thank you for your assistance,' but it could have been better’ or something like that… 
EMAIL: On January 12, 2010, with the subject line "DOE update," Woolard writes to Peter Darbee, who as mentioned earlier, was at that time the CEO and chairman of PG&E:
Peter – I understand you might be having breakfast with Secretary Chu tomorrow morning 
Woolard then goes on to complain about issues they are having:
 “stuck in bureaucracy” and that "Peter should drive the point home” could let him [Chu] know that if it not approved we would likely move to build projects in China as it will be the final signal that the US is dysfunctional… "
Woolard closes with:
Thanks in advance if there is any way you can help move this forward. Bechtel and Brightsource are in a detailed project review and are ready to move this project forward. Regards, John.
The next day, Woolard writes:
...without the doe loan guarantee pge is at risk for losing entire commitment and CA is at risk for RPS requirements.
Needless to say, about a month prior to the April 2011 approval, additional correspondences took place between March 5 and March 10, 2011.

EMAIL: On March 5, 2011, with the subject line, "Outline for DOE presentation," Joshua Bar-Lev (the Vice President Regulatory Affairs for BrightSource) alerts his internal masses…
  • The attached Outline will be filled in as talking points to be used by the political team. Over the weekend. Arthur, Jack and the deal team coming into DC Monday. 
  • Meetings at the highest level possible should be arranged for Tuesday/Wednesday with our champions. We will need you to schedule. You should work with Arthur on appropriate mtgs with DOI (like Steve Black) etc. Woolard coming in the following week. JW Will want meetings that week with the VP, Reid, Chu, Feinstein and other principles
  • Once Bernie Toon inculcated (shortly), you guys need to fold him in to the arguments, roles and get him the litigation and other info. 
  • JW just now heard from Gov’s asst Picker that Governor wants to talk to JW. That is happening now or shortly. Governor wants to express, as Gov and as former AG, “STRONG STATE INTEREST”….Will call Chu and may want to call President and VP. [this just happened –– SWEET].

NOTE: Bernie Toon is the former Chief of Staff then-Senator Joe Biden, profiled much earlier. Toon is the lobbyist that from March 6, 2011 until April 6, 2011, BrightSource had secured (via FIRST Group).

Furthermore, with this email dated March 5, 2011, Toon's part as well as these correspondence seem to coincide with those two March 2011 White House visits highlighted much earlier that was reported by The Wall Street Journal: March 9 and March 15 –– maybe even the next email exchange. 

EMAILS from March 8th and 9th, 2011, with the subject line, "DOE UPDATE," again Joshua Bar-Lev in an email exchange with BrightSource folks, writes the following, and cc's Bernie Toon: 
We just had a political meeting and concluded that it is prudent for JW and possibly others to be in DC next Tuesday. We are working on mtgs with our key senators, and with the VP and WH offices, and of course with Jonathan Silver, and possibly others..." Joshua concludes, “Is this like the Stanley Cup finals, seventh game, overtime, or what? Joshua
There was also discussion of a “signing ceremony,” whereas Gabe Horwitz (at that time the Executive VP at McBee Strategic Consulting) states:
Yes, it can be organized and having JW suggest it is a perfect avenue. Key is whether DOE wants a big splash to tamp down the downward pressure as a result of the IG report and solyndra or they want to just churn these out with much less fanfare.
Mr. Horwitz goes on...
John can further reference the Hill meetings/conversations we have been having and note to Silver that there is interest from senior leaders on the Hill to take a victory lap along with the WH on this and have a collective talking point for both Obama and the entire Administration to use in the midst of the unrest in Libya and need for further demonstration of domestic power.
Natalie Schaefer responded with concern:
Personally I don’t think you want to have a signing ceremony until everything is said and done… 
Ms. Schaefer mentioned another concern:
NRG met with Silver last week and was told by him: DOE will be ready by the 17th/18th, but its 'OK' if equity is not, we don’t need to fund until you are ready…
She went on …
...we MUST CLOSE by the 18th…this is the miss-messaging that people get confused about and I find myself having to explain away the differences and sensitivities here to timing and what issues impact the various dates (running out of money vs. govt shut down and loss of appropriations).
Josh replies with urgency:
The third week of March is a recess week; politically its better to do it next week and take a victory lap even BEFORE the cps are satisfied…

In the middle of all the pruning and prodding (mostly in early 2011, emails prove), there was plenty of fraternizing going on, starting with then BrightSource CEO Woolard biking and having sleepovers with Mr. Silver. We also see that Silver was hosting a party for John Bryson. Also, David Crane, the CEO of NRG Energy (up next), was sending invitations to Woolard and Bryson to a fundraising dinner at his home that included Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu. But Bryson declined Crane’s invite only due to the fact that it conflicted with a dinner he was having with Ted Craver and California Senator, Diane Feinstein.

There you have it: Despite the fact that during the loan review process, BrightSource Energy was bleeding money; they were obviously desperate for the cash; and their huge solar project loan was rated "speculative" at best, it didn’t sway the DOE in the least, because on April 11, 2011, the DOE announced the finalization of $1.6 billion in loan guarantees. Yep, this crony deal was made available by the 2009-Recovery Act, which was sold to the American people as means to save our economy from the brink of disaster and create American jobs. Yet, this $1.6 billion of stimulus money only created a "bird killing field" and a whopping 1000 construction jobs, with only 86 permanent jobs –– and very little green power. And now these mega-rich companies, stakeholders and investors want over $500 million more of taxpayer money. 

That should make your head explode, but there's more....

George Soros, NRG Energy, David Crane and Oversight Hearings 

Enter in NRG Energy, another huge energy corporation that I mentioned in the beginning of this post, that sometime in October 2010, during the time of the BrightSource DOE loan review process, “NRG became the lead investor ($300 million) in the Ivanpah solar project of the 392 MW Ivanpah project."

Needless to say, NRG has plenty of political access and influence, of which I documented in my March 2013 Green Corruption File entitled, Left-wing billionaire George Soros: Obama’s "Agent of Green." 

Labeled by the Right as "the single most destructive leftist demagogue," there has been much said and written about the politically powerful George Soros. Along with his deep-rooted shadowy agenda, we know that Soros funds numerous left-wing organizations, including radical environmentalism groups like the Tides Foundation. Most identified are the “anti-Fox” outlet Media Matters, the extremist as well as Obama’s left arm, Center for American Progress (CAP), the dark, driving force behind the president’s massive green energy scheme.

As Soros continues to bankroll the Left's far reaching progressive plans, he's more interested in the bottom line, which is evident by his own words: “I am basically there to make money. I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do.”

True to Soros' nature, despite the massive strain on our economy, he’s cashing in at the Green Bank of Obama.

Just after the release of Peter Schweizer’s blockbuster 2011 bestseller, one of the most damning revelations featured in Throw Them All Out aired on Stephen K. Bannon's Victory Sessions –– in an interview that starred Schweizer and Wynton Hall of
Billionaire George Soros gave advice and direction on how President Obama should allocate so-called “stimulus” money in a series of regular private meetings and consultations with White House senior advisers even as Soros was making investments in areas affected by the stimulus program.
Soros is one of numerous individuals and groups that had major influence over the trillion-dollar Recovery Act, which President Obama signed into law in February 2009 that was packed full of "clean-energy provisions" –– only to eventually cash in, along with their friends, on the tens of billions of green funds afterwards.

Schweizer revealed that "In the first quarter of 2009, Mr. Soros went on a stock-buying spree in companies that ultimately benefited from the federal stimulus," including twelve alternative energy and utility companies.

What's compelling is that after three weeks of intense research back in March of 2013, I discovered that through these twelve, and other timely investments in renewable energy, Soros' green tab exceeded $11 BILLION of stimulus money –– and "we, the taxpayer," footed the bill. Keep in mind that this tally is not factoring in the huge profit Soros is making off of these investments.

One of those timely transactions was 500,000 shares of NRG Energy, noted Schweizer, and as of the latest data I could find (the end of December 2012), his shares were at 866,137, which according to Insider Monkey, was at that time, valued at $19,912,000. 

President Obama’s other billionaire buddy Warren Buffett is also heavily invested in NRG Energy, as well as the fact that both Buffet and NRG Energy are invested in First Solar –– another Green Corruption tale we've shared: The First Solar Swindle. However, as you are about to learn, NRG Energy has its own influence...

NRG Energy and its Subsidiaries was the Recipient of Most of 1705 Stimulus Loans: $5.2 Billion of Taxpayer Money 

NRG Energy Inc., a Fortune 500 and S&P 500 Index company, owns and operates one of the country's largest and most diverse power generation portfolios that includes coal, nuclear, gas, wind and solar generation.

Both NRG Energy and the firm's highly paid president and CEO since 2003 (and stock owner) David Crane has been aggressively pushing clean energy, whereas Mark Gunther of in 2011 shed some light: "[Crane] is passionate about the climate crisis –– he was active in USCAP, the failed big biz-big green coalition that lobbied for federal regulation of greenhouse gases."

In fact, as I noted at the beginning of this post, Mr. Crane had this to say back in 2011:
"I have never seen anything that I have had to do in my 20 years in the power industry that involved less risk than these projects.” “It is just filling the desert with panels,” he added.
Crane was referring to how NRG and its partners secured $5.2 billion in federal loan guarantees for four large solar projects, including Ivanpah –– plus hundreds of millions in other subsidies.

While Crane is a friend of the Clintons, which is one reason why, in September 2010, NRG made a $1 million contribution through the Clinton Global Initiative to deliver solar power to Haiti. Crane did in fact place his bet on Hillary Clinton during her 2008 run for the presidency, but later, and along with other NRG executives, sided with then-Senator Obama.

In fact, as documented by Center for Responsive Politics, since 2002, NRG Energy has donated to both political parties, primarily to Republicans until 2008, when their giving shifted dramatically to blue. NRG Energy continued that trend in 2010 and 2014, and it seem that in 2012, they gave to both parties equally.

In my Soros File, you'll find additional NRG Energy executives and their Democrat cronies, as well as the fact that their subsidiaries have snagged huge amounts of clean-energy funds from the Obama administration –– including the fact that NRG companies have already benefited from the 1603 grant program, which as mentioned at the beginning of this post, was created under the 2009-Recovery Act "to support the deployment of renewable energy resources."

Now, NRG wants to tap into the 1603 stimulus program again in order to salvage their $1.6 billion DOE loan for their Ivanpah Solar Project, so, we'll stay focused on the stimulus loans that they were awarded.

In a very damaging in June 2012 report by Veronique de Rugy (mentioned earlier), which included her testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, we see that "most of the money has gone to large and established companies rather than startups" –– NRG being the largest winner.

Ironically, when Ms. de Rugy presented her testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on June 19, 2012, Mr. Crane was there as well –– of which we find via his written statement, some startling numbers.

Besides the $5.2 billion in 1705 DOE loans for four projects, there are seven 1603 grants from the 2009-Recovery Act listed by Crane that went to NRG subsidiaries, totaling over $155 million. Plus, NRG had acquired Solar Power Partners (SPP) in November of 2011, and they too, prior to NRG's acquisition, snagged 16 of those 1603 tax-free stimulus grants with a grand total just over $29 million. In the mix, there are millions in green funds that Crane missed.

But what's more relevant here, is that during the course of the June 2012 House Oversight testimonies, and in an amusing line of questioning, Ohio Representative Jim Jordan confronted Crane about three of the projects worth about $4 billion. Jordon asked: received those solely on the merits of the project...No, nothing based on friends in high places and political connections?
Crane responded:
"I believe so."
Jordon also asked if Mr. Crane had been to the White House. Crane replied, "many times," of which he admitted that "between the Bush White House and the Obama White House" it was 14 to 15 times," of which 6 to 7 of his visits were with the Obama White House.

Crane then explained some of his several meetings:
  • President Obama, a group on climate change
  • Vice-President Joe Biden regarding the clean energy standard 
  • Climate Czar Carol Browner and Valerie Jarrett about the nuclear loan guarantee program 
Considering NRG is also part of the $1.6 billion BrightSource DOE deal, Jordon lastly brought up the March 7, 2011 email exchange between CEO of BrightSource John Woolard and Jonathan Silver, the former Executive Director of the DOE's Loan Program Office –– again, both profiled  earlier.

This particular email that Representative Jordon was referring to is where Woolard asked Silver to look over a letter drafted by Woolard and then-BrightSource chairman John Bryson that requested direct White House influence in BrightSource’s loan guarantee application. The letter, intended to be sent to then-White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley, said:
"We need a commitment from the WH to quarterback loan closure between OMB and DOE.” It also included a request for “guidance and support from the White House.”

Crane said he "knew nothing!"

Crane's testimony did confirm at least one of those meetings, because old White House visitor logs reveal that NRG's Jason Few (husband to a 2012 campaign bundler for Obama), along with NRG chief executive David Crane, met with White House official Valerie Jarrett in the West Wing on December 7, 2010.

This Jarrett meeting coincides with the 10/31/12 House Oversight EMAILS, which we've been reporting on ever since their release. These emails also reveal that contrary to testimony and statements by the president, DOE and White House officials, President Obama and the White House were actively involved in pressuring and approving these loans.

In this particular set, dated from November 16, 2010 to December 6, 2010, the parties were James McCrea (Loan Program Office Credit Advisor) and Jonathan Silver (former Executive Director of the DOE's Loan Program Office) as well as Matthew Winters (Department of Energy Policy Advisor), Julie Stewart (contractor for the Loan Programs Office), Roger McDaniel (contractor for the DOE), and a few others in the mix.

In November 2010, they were concerned about the Agua Caliente project being on the fast track process –– of which we now know came directly from the White House –– where on November 16, 2010, Mc Crea writes: 
I have heard nothing from Judd today and do not know whether we are on a fast track process or not for Agua Caliente. Kelly is asking that we set up a briefing but it is my understanding from the part of the WH meeting that I was in that fast track would not include any briefings. I do not want to set a briefing and in doing so inadvertently concede that this is not fast track. Hence, I am holding off on responding to OMB. 
By December 1, 2010, they were discussing STP (South Texas Project Units 3 and 4 in Texas, an NRG Energy and CPS Energy Joint-Undertaking), of which they were considered for a 1703 loan guarantee. And we know that out of 19 applications, at that time only two large loans out of that program were approved.

Ms. Stewart writes to McCrea:
Jim...we understand that David Crane of NRG is coming in to meet with Jonathan regarding STP next Monday.
Mc Crea replies that same day:
I heard at dinner that Terry had informed Paul this evening that Crane is also trying to see the VP.
On December 6, 2010, Subject line: STP 3&4 Update for 7th Floor, Importance: High –– Matthew Winters opens up with:
Jim/Terri- Valerie Jarrett is meeting with the CEO's of NRG and Reliant tomorrow, and they are looking for a short background/update on the STP 3&4 project. Based on Terry's memo to Jonathan, and our brief conversation this morning, I've drafted the following. 
McCrea responds to Winters with a critique of the review process:
 Matt - ...I think that the discussion needs to reflect that the transaction cannot merely move forward based on a review but rather, it requires completion of the significant on-going negotiations which will have to close out some rather significant and stubborn issues." McCrea goes on, "That said, we need to make sure that no one commits to move STP 3&4 forward in the near future or it will knock quite a number of high priority deals off track...
Later that day, McCrea writes to Matt Winters and Terrence Houlihan, and CC's David Franz then Acting Executive Director, LPO; Acting Director, ATVM):
One other thing to note is that NRG is on a number of the transactions that will be adversely affected if resources have to be diverted to STP 3&4.
Now it's hard to say how that Jason Few, David Crane and Valerie Jarrett meeting went on December 7, 2010, but we do know that while the STP loan may have been crushed, NRG received their fair share of DOE loans, of which details can be found in my March 2013 Green Corruption File. 

NRG was part of the $3 Billion First Solar Swindle 

In getting back to NRG's $5.2 billion in approved DOE loans –– the number one recipient of most the 1705 stimulus loans, we must reiterate that they are also part of the $3 billion First Solar Swindle –– money laundering for Obama cronies that is.
  • Exelon (Antelope Valley Solar Ranch): $646 million 1705 loan 
  • NextEra Energy Resources, LLC (Desert Sunlight): $1.46 billion 1705 loan 
  • #1. NRG Solar, LLC (Agua Caliente): $967 million 1705 loan

Additional NRG DOE Stimulus Loans 
  • #2. NRG Energy, Inc. (BrightSource): $1.6 billion 1705 loan (#2)
  • #3. NRG Solar (California Valley Solar Ranch): $1.237 billion 1705 loan, $430 million in treasury grants, special state tax breaks, and much more. (#3) 
  • #4. Prologis (Project Amp): $1.4 billion 1705 loan, however, this stimulus loan was pulled

More BrightSource Energy, Ivanpah Heavyweights in the Mix 

Bechtel National (Bethal Group)

There are additional political heavyweights that have been hovering over this deal, starting with Bechtel, which is another big corporation with their hand in the stimulus, which constructed the Ivanpah project.

While Bechtel National (Bethal Group) –– with ties to Washington DC –– has given to both political parties quite evenly over the years, they did contribute to Barack Obama both in 2008 and 2012.

Due to their influence over the in the stimulus package that included the $6 Billion Democrat Earmark, I covered Bethal Group in my June 2013 file entitled, Nuclear Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Citigroup & Goldman Sachs 

During the course of unleashing my February 23, 2013: Citi’s Massive ‘Green” Money Machine,
I reminded my readers that Citigroup –– labeled a “heavy hitter” by Center for Responsive Politics –– in 2012 contributed to both President Obama and Mitt Romney, and "contributions from CITIGROUP PAC-FEDERAL" went to both parties: 47% to Democrats, 53% to Republicans. Also those  among the 2012 Obama bundlers were employees of big-name firms including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Barclays and Citigroup.

Yet, in 2008, it was primarily a "blue year" with 63% to Democrats and 37% to Republicans, and Citigroup made it as the #7 top donor to candidate Obama with a few executives lined up as campaign bundlers.

I also emphasized the infiltration of so many Citigroup executives –– and Goldman Sachs for that matter –– inside the Obama administration, and how they were even shaping his economic policy. 

Then I unleashed their connections to "the green": Other than SolarReserve, SolarCity and Alta Wind, I found Citi’s green stash –– an alternative energy portfolio that lists about 37 transactions (plus SolarReserve = 38) foreign and here in the United States. Citi's roles range from investor, advisor, arranger, to joint bookrunner, and so on –– and in some case a multitude of these.

While Citi is proud of their being the "largest market share (28 percent) of the DOE energy 1703/1705 Loan Guarantee program financing," there is much more. After careful analysis of this year-old green investment documentation, I found that 58 percent of their "clients" have received government subsidies, the majority from the 2009-Recovery Act, totaling approximately $16 billion of taxpayer money. 

This included Citigroup's part in the BrightSource deal as their "Ongoing –– $250mm IPO / Joint Bookrunner."

On April 11, 2011, the DOE announced the finalization of $1.6 billion in loan guarantees for BrightSource’s Ivanpah project, and just fifteen days later, Goldman, Citi, Deutsche stepped in:  "US solar energy firm BrightSource Energy Inc said on Friday it had mandated Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), Deutsche Bank Securities and Citigroup (NYSE:C) as underwriters of its proposed initial public offering (IPO)."

However, a year later, they canceled their IPO, and then-BrightSource CEO John Woolard told that it was "because of the weak public markets, particularly for solar and greentech companies..." To date BrightSource Energy's IPO is still pending.

Yet, we do know that Goldman has made equity investments in the solar developer BrightSource, which was reiterated in January 2014, when Renew Economy reported the following: "[Goldman] has also a substantial investment in BrightSource Energy," –– highlighting their Ivanpah solar power facility.

Goldman Sachs on the other hand, was a top Obama donor in 2008, but we also know that two Goldman executives sat on Obama's 2008 Finance Committee and a slew of partners, executives and board members bundled for, and donated to Obama's 2008 campaign. Meanwhile, his administration has been infested with Goldmanites. Even though in 2012, Goldman Sachs turned their back on Mr. Obama in 2012, there were many executives and board members that helped him get reelected.

Considering that Goldman Sachs become a CAP donor as early as 2012, I unleashed most of their green corruption inside my March 2014 post: Podesta Power and Center for American Progress: The dark, driving force behind the president’s massive green energy scheme. 

In short: Needless to say, since 2010, I've been following Goldman and tracking how this Big Bank has been cashing in on the stimulus funds. As my research developed, I found their DNA all over this green energy scheme, of which to date we can confirm that Goldman Sachs has an invested interest –– via various roles, and having entered the scene at different junctures (before, during and after taxpayer subsidies were awarded), in many projects and firms that received loans, grants and special tax breaks. So far I've tracked at least 14 firms connecting Goldman to over $8.5 billion from the Green Bank of Obama, the majority from the 2009-Recovery Act.

In closing...

The sun may not be shining enough on the Ivanpah Solar Plant, but if not for a federal loan guarantee –– $1.6 billion of taxpayer money that is –– the $2.2-billion project would have never seen the light of day in the first place. 

Now this massive solar power plant, which is struggling to produce power, has become the "$2.2 Billion Bird-Scorching Solar Project" –– with even the left-leaning Los Angeles Times, chronicling their grand opening like this:
After nearly four years of construction that killed desert tortoises, burned the feathers off passing birds and mowed down thousands of acres of native flora, Ivanpah officially opened last month with a gala that included a rock band and a horde of dignitaries — Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz among them.
And these superpower mega-rich companies that have billions on their balance sheets, along with their wealthy CEO's, investors, and shareholders have the nerve to expect $539 million of free taxpayer cash to help them pay off their $1.6 billion federal loan –– a loan that had already bailed out at least the ringleader, BrightSource Energy. Worse, is that because those behind this mega deal are Obama and Democrat cronies, this administration will most likely give it them.

Yep, this is absolutely obscene!

November 24, 2014: The David Madeira Show with Christine Lakatos on Green Corruption and solar power plants that don’t work.